Skip to main content

Those Who Love No Mercy(The Psychology Of Dark Souls)


Hear me out here.

I think there is definitely a psychological profile for people who like to play brutally difficult video games that don't really give you that many hints or clues of where to go next. They are the ones that love and cherish moments of no mercy, games that punish the player repeatedly and offer a challenge that is so great that it can take months of their time to finally conquer and overcome.

These are individuals that love challenges. They love them so much that they become easily addicted and obsessed with overcoming and beating them. I would not surprised at all if a high percentage of these gamers are extroverts, rather than introverts.

Where people like myself are more withdrawn and overcome challenges and obstacles but prefer to do it at our own pace with a clear path available. This is why games like Dark Souls really get on my nerves very quickly and aren't that much fun to me and I don't get wrapped up in their gaze and feel like I must play the same level hundreds of times and fight the same boss hundreds more to feel a sense of accomplishment or euphoria.

I don't see the point in continuing to play and continuing to die again and again just for the slim chance that I might win this time. It's like gambling your money away at a casino or making bets. The chances are you will lose more games than you win, but that slim chance of winning really propels certain people with certain psychological profiles and personalities to go to extreme lengths to win as much as possible.

How many players spent days of sleepless or long nights playing Dark Souls trying to get their next fix and trying desperately to get past the next big boss on cue? I am sure there were plenty of players then and there are just as many now. Some people love that feeling. And game developers know it. So they fashion games like Dark Souls to appeal and quench that particular thirst. And if you don't have it or don't like the taste of it, games like Dark Souls lose a lot of their appeal. Developers are playing a game within a game. They are not only making the framework for the game but also putting in the time to press the players buttons as much as they press the buttons on their controllers.

Games like Dark Souls though do not press my buttons. I personally could care less about beating the boss or getting to the next level after stumbling around the levels with almost no clues of where to go next or dying hundreds upon hundreds of times to get one little thrill of beating one boss in a game with hundreds of bosses with difficulty that gets more and more insane as you progress further into the game. The risk and the time spent, in my eyes, is not worth the reward. I had more fun customizing my character and watching the cut scenes than playing the actual game.

Give me a game that increases the difficulty gradually over time, and provides clearer paths and directions on what to do next over a game that throws countless unknowns at you, very few clues and has a difficulty level from the very start that makes you want to toss your controller through a wall.

The stress games like Dark Souls put me through is not worth the end result of dying for hours on end until I finally get past one boss or to the next stage. The end result for me is nowhere near as gleaming as it is for others with different personalities and profiles. So what makes this game great and a must play for others does not work the same way for me or other individuals with the same profiles and personalities that alter and affect our perception and subjective opinions on what games we like playing and which ones we don't.

This is why in my view, there is no soul in Dark Souls. It relishes in glee in your misery and torment and it wants to beat you down until you submit and begin to enjoy the punishment and ask for more. It knows that if it can give you just enough of a clue and skill to move forward or to beat one boss, that it can grab you by the neck and get you to crawl further into the dungeons and fight even harder enemies and try to hurdle even higher obstacles just to say that you beat it in the end. But it knows that victory is hollow and as soulless as the game itself.

Now that's dark.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Games On Film: Double Dragon(1994)

Double Dragon. One of the simpliest and easiest games to ever adapt to film. Two brothers have their girlfriends kidnapped by a bunch of thugs, and its up to them to fight through a city of enemies to get them back. Its still a shock to me that it sill has not been adapted properly on film after all these years. I mean hell even the cartoon series based on the game didn't get it right and of all things took inspiration from this monstrosity instead. A monstrosity that is so horrendous and awful that most people don't even know of its existence. I only know of it because I actually used to watch it quite a bit when I was a kid. Unlike Super Mario Bros. and Mortal Kombat, Double Dragon definitely does not hold up. It is just a cringe fest. The acting is atrocious, the fight scenes are pathetic, the story is a mess, its tone is all over the place, its boring, and its terminally lame. I mean it even manages to do the impossible and make Alyssa Milano unattractive. I am n...

The Fun Factor | What Makes Video Games Fun (Part One)

Video Games are usually synonymous with fun , much like any other form of play, video games can be a thrill to the senses and be some of the most rewarding activities out there. But what is it exactly that makes games fun? And are there particular elements in any game that determine how fun a game is and is there a way to take those elements and use them to make the experience of playing a game that is not considered fun enjoyable?  Now in order to really find out the answers to those questions, it is necessary to dig deep and discover what fun is and means, what its correlation is to video games , and how all of this creates the foundation for fun to be tied to video games. The Miriam Webster dictionary describes fun as “what provides amusement or enjoyment”. And also according to Miriam Webster, fun first appeared in the English language in the 1600s in France and the term made its way to the United States when petty criminals from London were carried over to the shores of the...

Game Changers: Pewdiepie & Markiplier

When the game is changed, it does not always have to be something considering the mechanics, or the way the game is seen by a wide audience. It can simply just be the way it is displayed. And these two you tube titans have definitely changed the way that an entire generation has viewed video games. Pewdiepe and Markiplier have millions of subcribers between themselves and have struck gold with a demographic of young kids who are either just getting into gaming or are already immersed into it. Both started out with channels that posted "Let's Play" content that started off slow but soon started to hit the ground running and they have both surpassed any of their own personal expectations for themselves, their channels and of their peers. Before these two came along, yes, there were "Let's Play" you tubers but none that had the massive success and viewcounts that these two would recieve. A lot of people ended up playing a lot of the horror games that they origi...